SPV Investor Limits Restrict Access
Ben Haber, CEO of Monark, on building the DTCC for the private markets
The real choke point is not matching buyers and sellers, it is packaging demand into legally usable vehicles. In private secondaries, SPVs solve cap table clutter by putting one line on the company cap table instead of dozens of names, but the investor limit means each vehicle can hold only a small crowd. That forces managers to raise bigger checks from fewer people, which keeps minimums high and makes broad retail style access hard to scale.
-
SPVs are the preferred wrapper because they let interests trade above the cap table, without forcing the company to process every transfer. That removes a lot of operational friction versus direct share transfers, where issuers can slow or block sales through approvals and ROFR processes.
-
The bottleneck shows up directly in ticket size. Monark describes current pre-IPO SPVs as often stuck at $25,000 minimums or far higher, because a limited number of investor slots has to absorb a full deal. Lowering the minimum to around $10,000 gets much easier if each SPV can take many more holders.
-
The likely unlock is regulatory expansion of qualifying venture capital fund limits. Current SEC materials describe a qualifying venture capital fund as able to have up to 250 beneficial owners, and 2025 legislation advanced in the House would raise that ceiling to 500 while increasing fund size limits. More slots per vehicle would let platforms spread one block of stock across many smaller checks.
If these limits keep expanding, private market liquidity shifts from a high minimum brokered product to something that looks much closer to standard brokerage distribution. The winners will be the infrastructure platforms that can form, administer, custody, and report thousands of smaller positions cleanly through existing brokerage accounts, because once the wrapper scales, demand is already there.