Vertical fintechs challenging neobanks
Varo
The main shift is that digital banking stopped being a one size fits all land grab and became a fight over who owns the most valuable customer workflow. Varo built a broad checking and savings app for everyday spending, but vertical fintechs start with a sharper reason to join, like student debt at SoFi, automated investing at Betterment, or identity based community at Daylight. That sharper wedge can make acquisition more efficient and customer habits deeper than a general purpose neobank.
-
Horizontal neobanks mostly monetize everyday card spend. Chime and Varo popularized no fee accounts and early paycheck access, with revenue driven largely by interchange, which keeps ARPU low unless they add lending, investing, or other higher value products. That made room for specialists to win users with a more specific financial job to be done.
-
The specialist examples each pulled on a different workflow. SoFi started with student loan refinancing and moved upward into a broader financial app, while Betterment built around automatically sweeping cash into ETF portfolios and charging on assets. Daylight used community specific features and brand trust to attract LGBTQ customers, showing how niche distribution can matter even when the banking rails underneath look similar.
-
Varo did try to differentiate structurally by becoming the first US fintech to receive a national bank charter in 2020, which let it keep more of the economics and launch products as a bank. But the charter did not remove the market pressure created by rising CAC, low product depth, and specialists attacking higher value segments from the side.
From here, the winners in consumer fintech will look less like plain checking accounts and more like bundled financial operating systems built around a strong initial wedge. For Varo, that means turning a broad deposit base into higher engagement products, especially credit, while vertical players keep expanding outward from their niche into full stack banking.