Forterra's Autonomy Kit Strategy
Scott Sanders, chief growth officer at Forterra, on the defense tech startup playbook
This model is a way to win breadth without paying the full cost of being a defense operating system. The core idea is to build one autonomy kit, sensors, compute, and software that can be dropped into many vehicle types, then let customers or partners connect it to their own command systems and workflows. That keeps the product standardized enough to scale, but still broad enough to open multiple end markets from defense vehicles to yard trucks.
-
Anduril represents the pure platform path. It built Lattice as the common software layer, then expanded from border towers into counter drone and other systems by reusing the same sensing and autonomy foundation across products. Forterra is aiming one layer lower, selling the autonomy kit that makes those fleets usable in the first place.
-
Shield AI shows the adjacent playbook. It sells complete drones today, but is also licensing Hivemind so primes can plug its autonomy into their own aircraft. That is similar in spirit, a focused product that can spread across platforms without owning every end product or every battlefield interface.
-
The economic logic is simple. A repeatable kit lets Forterra buy the same chips and sensors across programs, spin up a new vehicle integration in about 60 days instead of years, and price against a commercial item rather than billing every engineering hour like a traditional contractor.
If this works, defense autonomy will split into a few layers. Full platform companies will own the command layer, tightly integrated kit companies will own the vehicle brain and sensor stack, and primes and OEMs will supply more of the metal. That would let autonomy spread faster across ground fleets because buyers can adopt one proven core product instead of funding a new stack for each vehicle.