Linktree Must Become Storefront
Linktree
The real risk is that link-in-bio only works as a big business when creators are actively turning audience into income. Linktree can grow users even in a weaker market, but its revenue base depends on creators paying for better pages, analytics, and commerce features because those tools help them sell more. When creator monetization slows, link-in-bio starts to look like a cheap utility instead of business software, which compresses willingness to pay and weakens expansion into higher value products.
-
Linktree sits at the traffic handoff point between Instagram or TikTok and a creator's actual business. That position matters only if the downstream business is healthy. In 2022, Linktree was still growing to about $33M ARR and 31M users, but category growth had already slowed as creator funding and monetization expectations reset.
-
The category response has been to move from link-in-bio to store-in-bio. Beacons added invoicing, email, CRM, and checkout, and Stan bundled selling downloads, courses, bookings, and affiliate products on the page itself. That shift is really an attempt to capture transaction value, not just charge $5 to $24 per month for a landing page.
-
There is a clear split inside creator software. Subscription tools like ConvertKit and Beehiiv kept growing through the contraction by serving creators more like SMBs, while storefront tools chased expansion revenue through commerce. For link-in-bio companies, that means the safest path is becoming operating software for serious sellers, not staying a broad consumer utility.
The next phase favors companies that can turn casual creators into merchants and keep growing with the few who become real businesses. Linktree's strongest move is to climb from profile page to storefront, CRM, and payments layer. If social commerce keeps underdelivering, the winners will be the platforms that monetize creator workflows directly, not the ones that mainly route clicks.