Private Equity Avoids China-Dependent Brands

Diving deeper into

Sean Frank, CEO of Ridge, on the state of ecommerce post-COVID

Interview
a lot of private equity sellers don't want to buy Chinese-dependent companies
Analyzed 4 sources

This is really about exit quality, not just sourcing. A consumer brand that depends heavily on China can look fragile to a buyer because one policy change, tariff jump, customs delay, or geopolitical flare up can squeeze margins fast and disrupt inventory. Ridge is building Arizona capacity partly to look more durable in an acquisition process, while also using domestic production to support export positioning and strengthen its anti knockoff case.

  • For a buyer, China dependence means concentrated operational risk. If most units come from one country, the acquirer inherits exposure to shipping delays, tariff changes, and sudden rule shifts, exactly when D2C margins are already under pressure from higher ad costs and fee extraction across Meta, Google, and Amazon.
  • Ridge frames its Arizona factory around three concrete benefits. It lowers China exposure, makes the company more attractive to future acquirers, and helps sell Made in USA goods abroad. It also supported Ridge's effort to win an ITC general exclusion order against imported knockoffs.
  • The broader ecommerce playbook is shifting the same way. Shein has been building U.S. warehousing to reduce reliance on direct from China parcel flows, and Quince is differentiated partly by spreading manufacturing across India, Italy, Turkey, Mongolia, and Portugal instead of relying mainly on China.

Going forward, premium ecommerce brands will be valued less like simple marketing machines and more like resilient supply chains with a brand attached. The winners will pair high gross margins with multi country manufacturing, domestic assembly where it matters, and logistics setups that keep inventory moving even when trade rules change.