Defense Versus Enterprise Sales Motion
Ross Fubini, Managing Partner at XYZ Capital, on the defense tech opportunity
The core implication is that dual use companies are really running two different businesses under one roof. Government revenue tends to arrive in bigger chunks after long procurement and compliance work, while enterprise revenue comes through a steadier pipeline of reps, demos, pilots, and annual contracts. That is why teams, forecasts, and even board reporting often have to be split by motion rather than managed as one blended sales engine.
-
In defense and federal sales, timing is shaped by budgeting and procurement, not just product demand. Programs can take 18 to 24 months to become meaningful, and early revenue often starts with small paid trials or pilot contracts before scaling into larger systems of record.
-
Enterprise sales is closer to a normal inside sales motion. A team can call on buyers, run demos, close smaller contracts, then expand accounts over time. That creates smoother monthly revenue even when each individual deal is much smaller than a government award.
-
The companies that handle both motions well usually have leaders who know public sector buying from experience. They build a dedicated federal practice, invest in compliance like FedRAMP, and keep that machinery separate from the faster enterprise team instead of forcing one playbook onto both.
Going forward, more defense adjacent software companies will be built with this split architecture from day one. The winners will use commercial revenue to fund product speed and use federal revenue to unlock larger long duration contracts, turning an awkward two track go to market into a durable advantage.