Product-first defense startup playbook
Scott Sanders, chief growth officer at Forterra, on the defense tech startup playbook
Anduril worked because it sold the government a finished thing, not a promise to build one. The early product was a border surveillance system that could be deployed fast, priced like a commercial product, and improved over time through recurring software and support, which let Anduril skip years of custom R&D contracting. That is also why Forterra moved from applied research toward a repeatable product stack sold across defense and commercial vehicle programs.
-
The real wedge was not defense in general, it was one urgent buyer with budget and authority. Customs and Border Protection had a live surveillance problem, Boeing's earlier approach had been slow and expensive, and newer edge GPUs made Anduril's tower economics finally workable.
-
Recurring license basis means the money model looked more like software than like a classic defense prime. Instead of billing hours on a cost plus development contract, Anduril could sell a fixed product, keep ownership of the tech, update the software, and layer new use cases like counter drone on the same core stack.
-
This is why the broader market shifted from research shops to product companies. Palantir and SpaceX helped force agencies to buy commercial technology, Anduril proved a startup could field hardware plus software quickly, and Forterra is following that path with one autonomy kit reused across military and industrial vehicles.
The next wave in defense tech will be less about copying Anduril and more about finding one sharp entry point, then expanding from a shared software and hardware core. Companies that can turn an urgent program into a repeatable product line will compound fastest, because every deployed system becomes a reference, a dataset, and a cheaper starting point for the next contract.