Passes reduces merchant risk via policy
Passes
Passes is using content policy as a payments advantage, not just a brand position. For a creator platform, card networks and processors care less about audience aesthetics than about what gets sold, how often buyers dispute charges, and how hard a platform is to moderate. By banning explicit nudity while still letting creators sell flirtier subscription content, Passes can stay closer to mainstream processor rules than OnlyFans, while monetizing fans with much higher willingness to pay than typical safe-for-work creator tools.
-
OnlyFans shows the tradeoff clearly. It scaled to about $1.4B of revenue in 2024 on a 20% take rate, but its NSFW identity limits mainstream expansion and keeps payments and compliance as core operational constraints. Passes gives up the most explicit content category in exchange for lower merchant risk and broader creator appeal.
-
The practical issue is chargebacks and processor rules. In creator software, platforms that stay within stricter KYC and low chargeback guardrails can use standard payment rails more easily, while grey area marketplaces and adult platforms face tighter scrutiny. That boundary ends up shaping product design, moderation workload, and gross margin.
-
This also explains why Passes can charge creators less. Passes was positioned at a 10% take rate plus $0.30 per transaction, versus OnlyFans at 20%, while still offering higher value monetization than tools like Stan or Linktree. The payments profile helps support that lower pricing because less risky transactions are cheaper to process.
The category is likely to keep splitting into cleaner, processor-friendly platforms on one side and fully adult or grey market platforms on the other. That favors Passes if it can keep its policy line clear as it adds paid DMs, livestreams, and other high intent products, because the winners will be the platforms that capture OnlyFans-like monetization without inheriting OnlyFans-like payment friction.