Ro and the telehealth capital cycle

Rohit Kaul
View PDF

TL;DR: D2C telehealth companies have come a long way from hocking generic Viagra, but the twin speed bumps of lofty valuations and the post-COVID reset are hitting them hard. Check out our coverage of KryRo (including our Ro revenue model spreadsheet) and Quartet Health and read our interviews with Pawp CEO Marc Atiyeh, Folx CEO Liana Guzmán, and Brendan Keeler, Senior PM at Zus Health to understand the road ahead for telehealth.

None

  • 2017 saw a major event in the pharma industry: Pfizer’s Viagra patent expired, making it possible for anyone to make cheaper generic versions. Suddenly there was a glut of Facebook and Instagram ads of shady websites selling generic Viagra at rock-bottom prices, duping customers and making them suspicious of anyone selling generic Viagra. (link)
  • Roman (now Ro, valued at $7B) and Hims (NYSE: HIMS) launched in 2017 to tap into the $4B ED market, using telehealth to do an end-around the stigmatized clinic visit. For the first time in US healthcare history, consumers could answer a few questions online, facetime their doctors, and get door-step prescription delivery in discrete GenZ-friendly packaging. (link)
  • Instead of charging insurers/employers for consultations like Teladoc (NYSE: TDOC), Ro and Hims made the consultations free and monetized in app by selling generic Viagra on a monthly subscription. Free consultations and cheaper generic Viagra reduced the cost per prescription to $10, while even the lowest co-pay ranged from $10 to $40. (link)
  • They grew their subscriber base by 75x (Hims) and 25x (Ro) in 9 months, scaling as an asset-light managed marketplace connecting consumers to doctors instead of employing them directly. They offered doctor consultations and filled prescriptions all in one app experience, removing regulatory barriers to scale like anti-kickback laws by not accepting insurance and by working only with contractors vs on-roll doctors. (link)
  • With the wide onset of COVID in April 2020, telehealth consultations exploded to 78x of Feb 2020 levels, leading Ro’s valuation to grow 10x to $5B and precipitating Hims’s $1.6B IPO. VCs would go on to pour $29B into digital health startups in 2021, 2x of 2020, and 4X of 2019. (link)
  • But COVID giveth and COVID taketh away—Ro’s yearly revenue growth dropped to an estimated 30% in 2021, and Hims is expected to grow by 50% in 2022, its lowest annual growth thus far. Revenue for others like Thirty Madison ($1B) and Cerebral ($4.8B) has been flat too, and in the biggest retreat in the telehealth space, Amazon shut down its B2B telehealth service Amazon Care. (link)
  • It's been hard for Ro and Hims to grow because of high churn (50%~ yearly) and because the majority of usage is still for their core ED products. Cross-sell into other conditions like hair loss has been lower than expected—for Ro, new subscribers to their ED product are still driving the largest share of revenue across their products. (link)
  • Compounding the problem, competition has driven up CAC—the early, rapid growth of Ro and Hims attracting numerous other startups, including Thirty Madison with Keeps for men's hair loss, Cerebral for mental health, Calibrate Health for weight loss, Actualize for men’s hormones, Nurx for female health and more. Similar to what we saw happen in consumer DTC, the fast followers came in, saturated the market, and drove up the cost of ads in a race to the bottom to acquire subscribers. (link)
None

For more, check out this other coverage from our platform:

Read more from

Ro Revenue, Growth and Comps

lightningbolt_icon Unlocked Report
Continue Reading

Read more from

Rula revenue, growth, and valuation

lightningbolt_icon Unlocked Report
Continue Reading

Read more from

Chobani revenue, growth, and valuation

lightningbolt_icon Unlocked Report
Continue Reading