Fanatics Skipping Apparel Quality Control
Scott Sillcox, sports licensing consultant, on the economics of Fanatics' contracts
This points to the core tradeoff in Fanatics' scale, the company got big enough inside league licensing that normal guardrails may no longer apply in practice. When one company runs the store, owns brands, and controls a large share of apparel volume, league review can shift from checking each SKU to trusting the operator. That helps speed and throughput, but it also makes basic execution mistakes, like color mismatch, sizing inconsistency, or factory coordination problems, more likely to reach fans.
-
The normal NFL process is highly manual and surprisingly small. Roughly 2 to 4 people review about 80,000 products a year across 175 licensees, checking logo placement, colors, and samples. A giant supplier can overwhelm a system built for many smaller vendors, which makes informal exceptions more likely once volume concentrates.
-
Fanatics is not just another shirt maker. It powers storefronts for more than 900 teams, leagues, and colleges, gets about 80% of revenue from commerce and apparel wholesale, and accounts for about 35% of licensed sports merchandise sales in the U.S. That footprint gives it leverage that ordinary licensees do not have.
-
The bigger issue is structure, not one bad batch of jerseys. Fanatics both sells merchandise for leagues and owns brands like Majestic, WinCraft, Mitchell & Ness, and Topps. Once the retailer is also a major manufacturer, league oversight gets blurred, because the same partner is handling distribution, supply, and a growing share of the products being reviewed.
The likely next step is tighter separation between Fanatics' roles. As leagues push for more competition and more channels, Fanatics will still be central, but the market is heading toward clearer rules for when it acts as store operator, when it acts as licensee, and when its products have to clear the same checks as everyone else's.