Editing Is the Commodity in Video
Lenny Bogdonoff, co-founder and CTO of Milk Video, on the video infrastructure value chain
The real value in business video shifts away from the timeline editor and toward owning the intake, storage, search, and distribution layer around raw footage. Once screen recording, livestream capture, captions, and basic clipping become standard features inside broader products, standalone editing gets harder to charge for. The winners look more like systems of record for company video, where teams can create clips, find past footage, manage brand assets, publish embeds, and tie content back to business outcomes.
-
Loom showed why capture can outrun editing. Its core job is simple, record screen and camera, send a link, move on. That made informal business video easy to create at scale, and pulled value upstream to the moment content is made, not the polishing step afterward.
-
Both Milk and Runway frame editing as broadly available, with FFmpeg, browser tooling, and AI turning cuts, captions, and reframing into repeatable features. Runway’s moat is speed and automation around the whole workflow, not the act of trimming clips itself.
-
Descript, Wistia, Canva, Synthesia, and newer AI video tools all push toward the same bundle, recording, editing, hosting, analytics, and publishing in one product. That is a sign that editing alone no longer anchors the product. It is one module inside a larger workflow stack.
From here, the strongest video companies will keep absorbing basic editing into larger suites, while building moats around searchable archives, templates, collaboration, security, analytics, and AI assisted creation. Video software is heading toward the same place documents did, editing is expected, but the durable platform owns the workflow and the repository around the file.