Kraken building the crypto Nasdaq
Arjun Sethi, co-CEO of Kraken, on building the Nasdaq of crypto
The real split is platform shape, not just geography. Binance has historically packed trading, yield, payments, wallet, and other crypto actions into one tightly controlled destination, while Kraken is trying to turn the exchange itself into shared infrastructure that different apps, partner services, and trader tools can plug into. That matters because professional traders do not want one generic screen, they want APIs, custom workflows, and products built around how they already trade and move money.
-
Kraken describes its own stack as service oriented. It has built separate pro trading, consumer trading, send and receive, and API products on top of the exchange, instead of forcing every user into one interface. Its API stack includes REST, WebSocket, FIX, and institutional API trading, which is exactly the kind of tooling professional desks expect.
-
Binance’s product set shows the opposite instinct. Users can trade, store assets, subscribe to Earn products, use payments features, and access other services inside the Binance environment. That breadth is powerful for retention, but it also centers product discovery, liquidity, and user behavior inside Binance’s own walls.
-
The Interactive Brokers comparison explains who Kraken is chasing. IBKR wins serious traders with workspace layouts, order management, scanners, charts, and broker tooling that fit into a trader’s daily routine. Kraken is signaling a similar ambition in crypto, to be the exchange serious traders build around, not just a consumer app they open occasionally.
This points toward a market where the winners are less like standalone exchanges and more like operating systems for money movement and trading. If Kraken keeps expanding its exchange into APIs, vertical apps, and partner rails, it can own the professional workflow layer, while more monolithic rivals stay strongest where convenience and product bundling matter most.