GrubMarket vs Amazon Business and Cheetah

The real threat from Amazon Business and Cheetah is not that they look like classic produce wholesalers, it is that they make food buying feel like modern business software. Amazon Business turns restaurant and office purchasing into a broad catalog checkout flow with business pricing, tax controls, and multi user accounts. Cheetah goes narrower, building around restaurant replenishment with app based ordering and direct delivery, which is closer to GrubMarket’s day to day workflow.

• GrubMarket is harder to displace than a simple marketplace because it bundles supply, software, and payments. It sells food to 500 plus grocery stores, 8,000 restaurants, and 2,000 corporate offices, runs WholesaleWare for ordering and inventory, and takes 10% to 15% marketplace commission plus recurring SaaS fees.
  1 sacra 2 sacra
• Amazon Business comes in from the procurement side. Its pitch is familiar purchasing controls for companies, with business only selection, quantity discounts, approval workflows, and invoicing. That works well for packaged goods and restaurant supplies, but is less tailored to fresh produce sourcing, distributor operations, and embedded wholesaler software.
  3 amazon 4 aboutamazon
• Cheetah is the cleaner direct comparable because it is built for restaurants buying food and supplies, not general business spend. That makes the competition most intense in frequent reorder categories where speed, price visibility, and local delivery matter, especially for independent restaurants and smaller chains.
  5 gocheetah 6 techcrunch

The market is moving toward one digital buying layer for food, supplies, software, and payments. GrubMarket is positioned to win where the customer wants an operating system for a wholesaler or restaurant supply chain, while Amazon Business and Cheetah will keep pulling more of the order flow that used to run through phone calls, reps, and paper invoices.