Vena's Excel Reliance Limits Growth
Vena
This risk is really about whether Vena remains a finance system of record or gets stuck as a comfort product for an aging user base. Vena wins today because mid-market finance teams already live in Excel, and Vena fixes the painful parts, like pulling data from ERP, CRM, and HRIS systems, controlling versions, and routing plans into PowerPoint and Power BI. But newer FP&A products are designing for people who expect live collaboration, dashboards, and cleaner workflows from day one.
-
The core tradeoff is familiar grid versus broader adoption. Vena is easiest to sell to teams that already love Excel, but browser first products like Runway and modern spreadsheet products like Equals are built to pull in CFOs, CEOs, sales leaders, and operators who want to click into a model, not inherit a workbook.
-
This pattern shows up in adjacent categories too. DataSnipper grew quickly by fitting directly into auditors' Excel habits, but its add in form also limits how far it can move into collaborative finance workflows higher in the org. Excel centric products often expand fast inside a narrow job, then hit a ceiling when the buyer wants a shared system, not a smarter spreadsheet.
-
Vena still has room because the installed Microsoft base is huge, and the product is already broadening from FP&A into sales, headcount, and operating planning at about $60K ACV, reaching an estimated $116.25M in 2024 revenue. The question is whether that expansion keeps feeling like modernization inside Excel, or starts looking like a legacy wrapper around Excel.
The next leg of competition will be won by whichever product best combines finance grade control with software that non finance teams actually want to open every day. If Vena can use AI, dashboards, and Microsoft ecosystem depth to make Excel feel invisible in the background, its familiarity stays an asset. If not, younger finance leaders will increasingly choose products designed around collaboration first and spreadsheets second.