European Startups Need a US Base
The state of European venture
US expansion only works when the company stops acting like a foreign satellite and starts building a second real center of gravity. The reason is simple, enterprise sales, partnerships, recruiting, and product decisions in the US move through local networks and fast feedback loops. A sales pod in New York that still waits on Europe for key calls will lose to rivals whose founder, GM, or product leader is in the room with customers every week.
-
The panel draws a sharp line between two models. One is a real transatlantic company, with a founder or senior leader relocating early. The other is a US office that mostly executes orders from Europe. The first can adapt its pitch and hiring to the market, the second usually stalls.
-
This matches how several European winners approached the US. Klarna built a major New York presence and ultimately listed on the NYSE, while SumUp bought Fivestars to gain an existing American merchant base, local team, and distribution network instead of building from afar.
-
The broader logic in the discussion is that Europe is fragmented, while the US is the biggest single software and fintech market. That makes early US entry attractive, but only if decision makers move with the market. Otherwise the company gets the cost of two geographies without the speed benefits of either.
The likely next step for more European startups is a split model, with R&D spread across Europe for talent and cost, and go to market leadership planted in New York or another US hub. The companies that make that move early will look less like exporters and more like global firms built with two home markets from the start.