Browser-first Video Product Strategy
Lenny Bogdonoff, co-founder and CTO of Milk Video, on the video infrastructure value chain
Browser based video creation is really a product and talent strategy, not just a technical choice. By building the editor in web technologies, Milk makes video tools easier to ship, easier for more engineers to work on, and easier for users to access instantly, even if the underlying rendering path is more expensive than specialized native code. That tradeoff matters most in fast moving categories where ease of editing and iteration beats raw encoding efficiency.
-
This approach sits on top of a bigger shift in video. As WebRTC and modern browser capabilities matured, companies like Loom turned the browser into a practical place to record and edit video, which widened the market from specialists using desktop tools to everyday workers making quick business videos.
-
The competitive upside is speed and expressiveness. Milk can let generalist engineers build new editing features in familiar browser tools, while users manipulate video in a more interactive way. The downside is higher compute cost, because frame generation and image compilation in browser sessions are heavier than running optimized C based pipelines.
-
Over time, the market has rewarded both sides of this tradeoff. VEED built a browser based editing suite to $45M estimated ARR by October 2024, while Synthesia scaled to about $146M estimated ARR by September 2025 by pairing easy browser workflows with heavier server side AI generation and enterprise features like hosting and analytics.
The direction of travel is toward hybrid architectures. More of the interface, editing logic, and lightweight processing will stay in the browser because that makes products feel instant and easy to extend. More of the expensive rendering and AI generation will move to the server. The winners will be the companies that hide that split and make complex video work feel as simple as editing a doc.