Secondaries for Cap Table Control
Diving deeper into
Charly Kevers, CFO at Carta, on progressive price discovery and investor relations
And if the only way to do this is through a primary, it limits your options.
Analyzed 4 sources
Reviewing context
Relying on a primary round to add pre IPO investors forces capital raising and cap table shaping into the same decision. A company may want a Fidelity or T. Rowe type holder on the cap table for public market preparation, but not need fresh cash. Secondary liquidity lets existing holders sell into those relationships, which brings in long duration investors without issuing new shares or diluting everyone else.
-
This is really about cap table control. As companies approach IPO, they often want to replace early investors or former employees with crossover funds that can buy in pre IPO, learn the business, and support the stock later. If that swap can only happen through a new primary, the company has to raise capital just to change who owns it.
-
Tender offers solve part of the problem, but often at stale prices. In a study of 64 tenders totaling more than $3B, 83% were priced at or below the last round and average participation was 37%. That means companies can provide liquidity, but not always efficient price discovery or broad investor onboarding.
-
The strategic alternative is more regular secondary activity. Spotify used recurring private share trading and ongoing disclosure before its direct listing, which gave investors a pricing history and gave management practice with investor relations. That is the model Kevers is pointing to, a gradual transition rather than one big financing event.
The market is moving toward private companies treating liquidity as an operating tool, not a rare exception. The winners will be the companies that use secondaries to steadily upgrade their cap table, build a real market signal for their stock, and arrive at IPO with the right owners already in place.