Erebor Treasury and Payments Revenue
Erebor
The important point is that Erebor would be earning for moving money and operating regulated workflows, not just for borrowing short and lending long. Traditional NII is spread income on deposits and loans. This newer pool looks more like treasury services, payments, custody, reserve account operations, and mint and redemption support, where revenue scales with transaction volume, account activity, and software like bank connectivity rather than only with loan balances and interest spreads.
-
The closest analog is not a branch bank, but infrastructure banks like Column and Lead Bank. They monetize account opening, ACH, wires, card issuance, and embedded banking APIs. Erebor is applying that model to stablecoin issuers and crypto native treasury flows, which adds settlement and on chain operating services on top of the bank balance sheet.
-
The stablecoin workflow creates several fee points. An issuer needs reserve operating accounts, cash movement into and out of those accounts, redemption handling, compliance review, custody and settlement support. Large incumbents like J.P. Morgan and BNY are already building pieces of that stack, which shows this is a real transaction banking market, not just a crypto niche.
-
This revenue mix also behaves differently from NII. Net interest income rises and falls with rates and loan growth. Processing style revenue is tied more to payment volume, customer activity, and product depth. That can make the business more durable if Erebor becomes part of a customer’s daily treasury workflow instead of just holding deposits.
The next step is a shift from crypto company banking to stablecoin operating infrastructure. If Erebor becomes the bank account, payment rail, and compliance layer behind issuer and enterprise treasury activity, it can capture recurring fee revenue every time dollars move between traditional accounts and on chain settlement systems.