/ dev / agents as Two-Sided Platform

The Android analogy matters because it points to a two sided platform, not just an AI feature. /dev/agents needs developers to build useful agent workflows, and it needs end users doing real tasks often enough for those workflows to matter. That is why the model combines subscriptions with transaction fees. One side pays for access and reliability, the other creates the commerce volume that can make the platform economically powerful over time.

• The practical reason to build at the OS layer is that normal apps and assistant APIs only expose narrow, pre approved actions. An OS level product can watch how a user actually moves across apps, then reuse those patterns to complete tasks like comparing ride prices or filling in flows across multiple services.
  2 sacra 3 openai
• The Android comparison also implies an open ecosystem strategy. In adjacent research on Android like platforms, the winning pattern is often to be the flexible layer that plugs into many other tools, instead of the all in one product. That fits /dev/agents trying to become the back end coordination layer for agents built by outside developers.
  4 sacra 2 sacra
• The hard part is the classic chicken and egg problem. Developers will not invest in building agent apps without users, and users will not adopt a new agent layer without useful apps. That makes distribution and trust as important as model quality, especially if the company wants to sit between existing apps and the end transaction.
  1 sacra 2 sacra

If this works, apps become less like destinations and more like services behind the scenes. The companies with leverage will be the ones that own the user context, route intent to the right app or merchant, and take a cut when money moves. That would turn /dev/agents from an AI assistant into a new transaction and distribution layer.