When integrations become infrastructure
Diving deeper into
Sara Du, co-founder and CEO of Alloy, on iPaas vs. universal APIs
people building those integrations in-house are slowly starting to realize it's becoming unmanageable.
Analyzed 5 sources
Reviewing context
This is the moment integrations stop being a feature and become infrastructure. Once a SaaS company needs a dozen or more connectors, the work is no longer just writing API calls, it is constant field mapping, auth handling, monitoring, and upkeep every time Salesforce, HubSpot, or an ERP changes something. That shifts the decision from build once to maintain forever, which is exactly where embedded iPaaS starts to win.
-
The pain compounds because buyers now expect broad coverage out of the box. Alloy describes mid market SaaS products needing CRM, ERP, and commerce connections, and Paragon frames this as shipping every integration customers ask for, not a one off project.
-
Universal APIs help first, then hit a ceiling. They standardize basic read and write flows across many apps, which is great for standing up simple integrations fast, but they often miss custom fields and user level configuration, so teams graduate to embedded iPaaS when customers want deeper workflows.
-
The real burden is not initial development, it is ongoing gardening. Connectors break when endpoints are deprecated, schemas shift, or partners change release behavior. That is why the winning vendors sell maintenance, monitoring, and relationship management with app partners, not just connector code.
The next step is that integrations become table stakes for software adoption, much like cloud hosting did for application deployment. As AI makes connector generation cheaper, the durable value will move toward reliability, configuration depth, and owning the customer facing integration experience inside the product.