Retail Trades Dominate Private Secondaries
Noel Moldvai, CEO of Augment, on building the Robinhood for private markets
This shows the private secondary market is starting to behave like consumer fintech, not just private banking. A few large institutions still drive most dollars, but software and SPV wrappers let platforms break one block of stock into many small tickets, so the transaction count shifts toward repeat individual buyers. That matters because it turns a business built around occasional high touch brokered deals into one built around self serve trading flow, recurring users, and much lower minimums.
-
Augment says it began almost entirely institutional, and is still about 80% institutional by volume, but now sees roughly 80% retail by trade count because investors can buy slices of an SPV in minutes without talking to a broker. The same workflow can handle a $10,000 order or a much larger one.
-
That pattern matches a broader market shift. Earlier secondary platforms were built around manual brokered transfers, company approvals, and months of paperwork. Newer structures use SPVs and software to consolidate many small buyers into one line on the cap table, which lowers friction for both issuers and smaller investors.
-
The strategic tradeoff is that retail scale only works if the platform controls fees and trust. SPVs made small check access possible, but stacked SPVs and extra intermediaries can push total fees sharply higher and muddy pricing. The winners are likely the platforms that keep structures shallow, pricing clear, and execution fast.
From here, the market moves toward a split model. Institutions will keep setting price in the biggest names, while retail increasingly supplies trade frequency, liquidity, and brand momentum around those names. As platforms standardize SPVs, lower minimums, and plug into wealth and brokerage distribution, private secondaries start looking less like bespoke banking and more like an always on trading product.