Payment Rails Not Seat Fees

This pricing model says the real battle in global payroll is over payment rails, not seat fees. A platform can look like plain payroll software on the surface, then make much more money when wages cross borders, get converted into local currency, or land in a wallet before reaching a bank account. Plane is positioning itself against that model by treating payroll like software and FX like pass through infrastructure.

• In this market, SaaS fees are often the entry ticket, while transaction revenue is the economic engine. For a company paying $10M a year to contractors, a typical model can generate about $50K of SaaS revenue and about $250K of transaction revenue, which is 5x as much.
  2 sacra
• That extra take usually comes from hidden layers in the payout flow, FX spreads, wallet withdrawal fees, interchange on spend cards, and float on prefunded balances. Ontop is a clear example of the hybrid model, pairing a low monthly fee with payment commissions, FX spreads, interchange, and float.
  2 sacra 3 sacra
• The product trade off is concrete. Wallet first providers can earn more because money sits inside their system longer, but workers may need an extra step to withdraw funds to a bank. Plane’s counter position is that payroll should end with money arriving in the worker’s chosen bank account, on time, without fees being taken out after payday.
  1 sacra 2 sacra

Going forward, the category will keep splitting between software first payroll products and fintech heavy payroll products. The biggest platforms will keep pushing wallets, cards, and FX because those layers multiply revenue per worker. The companies that win trust with startups and lean finance teams will be the ones that make total payout cost legible upfront, not just the monthly seat price.