Latin America Delivery Strongholds

This asset swap showed that food delivery in Latin America was already becoming a city by city stronghold business, not a winner take all regional land grab. In practice, each company found that cracking a market where rivals had already locked up top restaurants was too expensive and too slow, so trading subscale operations for home market strength was the cleaner way to build density, improve courier utilization, and stop burning money on head to head expansion.

• Exclusive restaurant deals mattered because the best local chains act like demand magnets. If the app with the most popular burger, sushi, and pizza brands is the only place customers can order them, rivals struggle to get orders dense enough for fast delivery and efficient courier routing.
  1 sacra 3 gov 4 gov
• The Brazil and Argentina swap follows the same logic seen in earlier regional consolidation. Delivery Hero bought PedidosYa in 2014 to add a leading Latin American network, then later kept scaling PedidosYa as its Argentina brand while iFood entrenched itself in Brazil.
  5 deliveryhero 6 deliveryhero 2 sacra
• That local fortress model later ran into antitrust pressure in Brazil. CADE first blocked iFood from signing new exclusivity contracts in March 2021, then in 2023 imposed limits on exclusivity deals, weakening one of the main tools incumbents used to freeze rivals out.
  3 gov 4 gov

Going forward, competition in Latin American delivery will be shaped less by who enters the most countries and more by who owns the best local supply in each major city without relying on hard exclusivity. That favors platforms that can keep restaurants, couriers, and consumers loyal through volume, service quality, and cross sell beyond restaurant delivery alone.