Primaries Anchor Tender Pricing
Charly Kevers, CFO at Carta, on progressive price discovery and investor relations
Tying a tender to a primary is mainly about issuer control over price. Once a company has just sold new shares in a financing, everyone already has a fresh reference price, so the secondary can ride on that work instead of reopening a long negotiation over what the stock is worth. That makes the tender faster to run, easier to explain to investors and employees, and cleaner for cap table planning, even if it often leaves employees selling at a stale price.
-
In practice, the primary does the hard part. The lead investor and company have already negotiated valuation, terms, and demand. The tender then uses that same price, sometimes with a small adjustment, as the clearing price for employee and investor liquidity. That is why secondaries are so often paired with new fundraises instead of run standalone.
-
This structure is popular because standalone tenders are slow and messy. Issuer controlled programs already require heavy legal work, disclosures, risk factors, tax analysis, and transfer logistics. Anchoring to a fresh round removes one of the hardest variables, price, and lets the company decide how much stock can be sold and who gets access.
-
The tradeoff is that convenience often beats true price discovery. Across 64 tender offers totaling more than $3B, 83% were priced at or below the last round, and overall participation was 37%. Less underpriced tenders got better participation, which shows employees often know the round based reference price lags the company’s real momentum.
The next step is a shift from event based liquidity to recurring market based liquidity. As private companies stay private longer, the pressure is to move from tender prices inherited from the last primary toward more frequent auctions that create a live price history, which helps recruiting, investor relations, debt pricing, and eventually a smoother path into the public markets.