Issuer Approval Limits Secondaries
Atish Davda, CEO of EquityZen, on the biggest bottleneck in the secondary markets
Giving companies control was the move that turned private share trading from a loophole into a real product category. After Facebook era chaos pushed issuers to clamp down on transfers, secondaries only restarted when platforms began structuring deals so companies could approve buyers, manage who got liquidity, and avoid a messy cap table. EquityZen fit that need by pooling buyers into a single fund line item instead of spraying new names across the ledger.
-
The bottleneck was never just buyer demand. Companies can legally block transfers, exercise ROFRs, or rewrite policies to shut the market down. Once that became common around 2011 and 2012, any platform that did not work with issuers was fighting the company, not solving liquidity.
-
Issuer involvement changes the workflow. Instead of an employee quietly finding a buyer and hoping legal approves it, the company can set who may sell, how much can be sold, and which investors are acceptable. That protects cap table control, which issuers consistently value more than raw liquidity.
-
This is also why company sponsored tenders became the dominant format, even though they often underprice stock. They scale better for issuers and keep the process orderly. In a 64 tender data set totaling more than $3B, 83% priced at or below the last round, showing how much control still outweighs perfect price discovery.
The market is heading toward more recurring, issuer approved liquidity rather than fully open trading. The winners will be the platforms that make companies comfortable enough to allow regular sales, because once issuers participate, employees get liquidity earlier, investors get cleaner access, and private markets start to behave more like an orderly on ramp to public markets.