Passes: Instagram fitness and chess subscriptions
Passes
This showed that Passes was not building a generic creator tool, it was carving out the narrow band between Patreon and OnlyFans where attractiveness could be monetized without crossing into porn. That fit especially well for Instagram fitness creators and chess personalities with large followings, because they could sell subscriptions, DMs, and livestream access while staying brand safer, paying a lower 10% platform fee than OnlyFans’s 20%, and avoiding the career tradeoffs tied to explicit content.
-
Passes’s early economics reflected a higher value creator base than mass market link in bio tools. It reached about $95M in GMV across 900 creators, or roughly $6,666 average revenue per creator, versus Stan at about $491 per store in 2023. That points to a smaller roster of creators with stronger fan monetization, not a broad long tail signup model.
-
The workflow was concrete. A creator could post suggestive but non nude photos, run paid livestreams, answer fan DMs, and sell tiered memberships, all inside one account. That matched creators whose audience wanted closeness and exclusivity, but whose business still depended on Instagram growth, brand deals, and mainstream reputation.
-
Competitors were serving different jobs. Patreon was a general membership product for podcasters, artists, and educators. Stan was built more for everyday knowledge creators selling downloads, courses, and paid calls from smaller audiences. Passes instead concentrated on creators with 100,000 plus followers where parasocial demand was stronger and monetization looked more like gated access than education.
Going forward, this niche can expand into a durable category of brand safe intimacy products. The winners will be the platforms that keep mainstream creators monetizing like adult platforms, while preserving safer content rules, better payment economics, and enough tooling to keep top creators from graduating to their own standalone membership stacks.