Human curation gated token communities
Diving deeper into
Q&A with Raihan Anwar and Colby Holliday from Friends with Benefits
Even if you have tokens, you still need to pass this gate of human curation.
Analyzed 2 sources
Reviewing context
This gate made FWB a curated club with a tradable token, not a pure pay to enter chat room. After the token crash, the team saw that wallet based access alone would let speculators and trolls flood Discord, so it added a 12 person membership team that reviewed applicants. That kept the social layer selective while still letting the token handle ownership, rewards, and governance.
-
The curation was concrete, not symbolic. Applicants bought tokens, filled out a short form with interests and location, then existing members voted in a Discord channel. Acceptance was about 40%, which meant capital got someone to the door, but community fit decided entry.
-
That split also limited whale power. Token holders could vote on Snapshot proposals, but the real agenda setting happened inside the member community. Buying a large stake could buy voting weight, but not the trust, discussion, and coalition building that shaped proposals before they reached a vote.
-
This worked especially well on Discord because the product is cheap for large communities and built for many channels, roles, and bots. FWB could layer human screening, token checks, newsletters, events, and custom tools on top of Discord instead of building a new social app from scratch.
The next step is turning curated membership into products that travel beyond one community. FWB was already using the model to build token gated events, newsletters, and Discord tools. If more communities want culture and status filters, not just wallet filters, human curation becomes the template and the software opportunity.