Selling autonomy across DoD markets
Scott Sanders, Chief Growth Officer at Forterra, on autonomy for every vehicle
The real moat is not winning one giant Pentagon program, it is turning one autonomy stack into many small and mid sized buying paths that add up to production scale. In practice that means selling the same edge compute, sensor fusion, navigation, and vehicle integration into different program offices, services, and adjacent commercial yards, so revenue does not flatline while waiting years for a single program of record.
-
Forterra frames the DoD as many micro markets, not one customer. Different PEOs and PMs buy with different budgets and rules, so the job is to align the product with several buyers at once, not force everyone into one acquisition path.
-
This model works when the product is generic enough underneath the mission wrapper. Backing up a missile trailer and moving a shipping container use the same core autonomy pieces, which lets one engineering effort feed defense logistics, tactical vehicles, and commercial yard trucks.
-
The comparable pattern is Anduril. Early momentum came from a ladder of smaller contracts before billion dollar scale programs, and the lesson carried forward is that venture backed defense companies need either multiple products or one product that can sell into multiple defense and commercial outlets.
As autonomy hardware gets cheaper and more vehicles become software defined, the winning defense robotics companies will look less like single program contractors and more like product companies that keep landing the same core system in new vehicle types and new budgets. That is how a defense startup grows into a manufacturing business instead of stalling in pilot mode.