Dedicated CartaX Secondary Funds
James McGillicuddy, head of strategy at Carta, on building an issuer-centric platform and investing in secondaries
Dedicated CartaX funds would have been a sign that private secondaries were maturing from opportunistic trades into a repeatable asset class. The logic was simple, CartaX was designed as an issuer controlled venue with recurring auctions, structured disclosures, and cleaner settlement through the cap table system of record, which makes it easier for a manager to tell LPs exactly how capital would be deployed and why these deals were more process driven than ad hoc brokered trades.
-
This was really a bet on product format, not just on demand. CartaX and Nasdaq Private Market sat in the issuer centric bucket, where companies choose who can buy, when trading happens, and how much stock can move. That setup looks more like a scheduled program a fund can underwrite, than a random stream of one off secondary blocks.
-
The natural buyers were not retail investors, but institutions and LP adjacent capital. In the period around CartaX, there was already movement toward direct secondary funds, co investment sidecars, and SPV style vehicles that let managers pool capital for specific private company opportunities without putting every underlying buyer directly on the cap table.
-
What held this back was trust and workflow. Most secondary volume still happened outside formal programs, many companies did not want to prioritize liquidity, and Carta later pulled back from brokering secondaries after conflicts around customer trust became acute. That limited the chance for a CartaX only fund category to fully form around the platform.
Going forward, the durable idea is not a fund brand tied to CartaX itself, but pooled capital built for issuer approved private liquidity. The winners are likely to be vehicles that can buy structured secondary allocations, work through SPVs and transfer agents cleanly, and fit around company controlled workflows without breaking trust with issuers.