Kraken as the Crypto Nasdaq
Arjun Sethi, co-CEO of Kraken, on building the Nasdaq of crypto
This comparison says the real split is not crypto versus crypto, but venue design. Coinbase has historically looked more like the default, trusted place to buy and hold assets, while Kraken has built for active traders who care about speed, deeper liquidity, API workflows, and moving money across products. That is why Kraken keeps describing the exchange as the base layer for pro trading, payments, and other financial services, instead of a single all purpose app.
-
Kraken frames itself around electronic market quality. It has emphasized 99.9% uptime, sub 2ms round trip latency, and higher revenue per customer than Coinbase, all signs of a business skewed toward professionals and institutions who trade often and need reliable execution.
-
The product stack follows that identity. Kraken has built separate apps for pro traders, consumer trading, and send and receive flows on top of the same exchange. That is closer to Nasdaq as market infrastructure, where one liquidity venue powers many workflows.
-
The money profile is different too. Kraken generated about $2,023 ARPU in 2024 versus Coinbase at $825, despite handling roughly half of Coinbase trading volume with only about 22% of the revenue. That points to a denser concentration of high value, high activity customers rather than a broader retail base.
Going forward, this pushes Kraken toward becoming a crypto first market utility, then expanding outward into stocks, derivatives, stablecoin payments, and tokenized assets. Coinbase is moving the same direction, but from a retail custody and investing starting point. The result is a market where exchange infrastructure, not just brand trust, becomes the main source of advantage.