Jellyfish's most recent valuation was set during its $71 million Series C round in February 2022, led by Accel, Insight Partners, and Tiger Global.

The company's funding history began with a $12 million Series A in May 2020, led by Accel and Wing Venture Capital. This was followed by a $31.5 million Series B in January 2021, led by Insight Partners with participation from Accel and Wing VC.

Jellyfish has raised a total of $114.5 million across all funding rounds.

Jellyfish connects to the development tools engineering teams already use through one-click OAuth integrations with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Jira, and dozens of other platforms. The system ingests signals like code commits, pull requests, issue transitions, calendar events, and payroll data without requiring any workflow changes from development teams.

The platform's core innovation is its patented Work Allocation algorithm that converts raw development activity into meaningful business insights. It reconstructs who worked on what, for how long, and maps that effort to strategic initiatives defined by leadership.

Engineering leaders use Jellyfish's dashboards to see where their budget is being spent across different projects, whether deliveries are on track, and how process changes affect team velocity. The platform generates executive-ready reports and can automatically create board presentation slides.

Recent product expansions include AI Impact tracking that monitors how coding assistants like GitHub Copilot affect productivity, and DevFinOps modules that help finance teams with R&D cost capitalization and tax credit reporting. The company also offers a free Developer Experience survey tool that correlates team sentiment with objective performance metrics.

Jellyfish operates a B2B SaaS model targeting engineering leadership and finance teams at mid-market to enterprise companies. The platform sells annual subscriptions with pricing typically scaling based on the number of developers being monitored and the breadth of integrations required.

The go-to-market approach focuses on engineering leaders who need visibility into resource allocation and delivery performance. Sales cycles involve demonstrating immediate value through historical data analysis, as the platform can backfill 12-18 months of development history overnight after initial setup.

The business model benefits from strong expansion dynamics as customers add more teams, integrate additional tools, and adopt new modules like AI Impact tracking or DevFinOps reporting. The platform becomes more valuable as it ingests more organizational data, creating switching costs and driving retention.

Jellyfish has expanded distribution through AWS Marketplace availability, reducing procurement friction for enterprise customers. The company maintains healthy unit economics with average contract values around $95,000 annually and has achieved near-breakeven operations while scaling revenue.

Atlassian represents the strongest competitive threat through its Compass product and recent $1 billion acquisition of DX in September 2025. The combination provides service catalogs, DORA metrics, and developer experience surveys embedded within the Jira ecosystem that 300,000+ customers already use.

GitLab's Value Stream Analytics and AI-native capabilities in GitLab 18 bundle engineering metrics directly into their development platform at no additional license cost. This integrated approach pressures standalone tools on pricing and reduces friction for existing GitLab customers.

Harness positions its SEI module as a comprehensive engineering management solution and won Forrester Wave Leader recognition in 2025. The company bundles these capabilities with CI/CD and FinOps to create platform deals that are difficult for point solutions to compete against.

LinearB focuses heavily on workflow automation with PR bots and automated alerts, positioning itself as a more hands-on alternative to Jellyfish's analytics-first approach. The company targets teams that want active intervention in their development processes rather than just visibility.

Swarmia and Haystack compete directly in the engineering analytics space with similar Git and Jira integrations. These European-based competitors often win deals based on data residency requirements and more aggressive pricing for mid-market accounts.

Code Climate and Pluralsight Flow target the developer experience and code quality angles, offering complementary but overlapping functionality around team health and productivity measurement.

ServiceNow's DevOps Insights module sells through existing ITSM relationships and ties engineering metrics to change management workflows. While serving different primary buyers, ServiceNow competes in Fortune 500 accounts where IT governance is paramount.

Microsoft's deeper Azure integration and GitHub Enterprise telemetry could eventually surface free organizational productivity metrics, potentially eroding Jellyfish's entry-level market opportunity as these capabilities become commoditized.

The launch of AI Impact Dashboard positions Jellyfish to capture value from the rapidly growing AI engineering tools market projected to reach $281 billion by 2034. As 90% of engineering teams adopt AI coding assistants, organizations need systems to measure ROI on tools like GitHub Copilot, Gemini, and Sourcegraph.

This expansion moves Jellyfish beyond traditional engineering metrics into AI governance and optimization, addressing board-level concerns about AI investment returns. The module tracks usage patterns, productivity gains, and cost efficiency across the entire software development lifecycle.

DevFinOps capabilities expand Jellyfish's buyer persona from engineering leaders to CFOs and controllers who need automated R&D cost capitalization and tax credit reporting. This addresses the growing complexity of software development accounting in an era of distributed teams and cloud-native development.

The SOC-1 compliant reporting gives finance teams a defensible alternative to spreadsheet-based tracking, particularly valuable for public companies facing increased scrutiny on R&D expense classification. EU and UK markets present additional opportunities given stringent R&D tax credit schemes and upcoming sustainability reporting requirements.

Jellyfish's AWS Marketplace presence removes procurement friction for the 330,000+ AWS customers and enables Enterprise Discount Program usage. The company is positioned to expand into regulated industries and global enterprises that require cloud-hosted solutions with data residency options.

Geographic expansion into APAC markets could capitalize on the region's large offshore engineering hubs, particularly India's 5 million developers. The platform's ability to provide visibility across distributed teams addresses a key pain point for companies managing global development operations.

Platform consolidation: The engineering tools market is rapidly consolidating as larger platforms like Atlassian, GitLab, and Microsoft bundle analytics capabilities into their core offerings. This trend could commoditize standalone engineering intelligence tools and make it difficult for Jellyfish to justify separate budget allocation when similar functionality becomes available at no additional cost within existing development platforms.

AI automation displacement: The emergence of AI agents that can automatically optimize development workflows and resource allocation could reduce demand for human-driven engineering management insights. As AI becomes more capable of making real-time development decisions, the value of retrospective analytics and manual resource planning may diminish significantly.

Economic sensitivity: Jellyfish's high average contract value and focus on engineering optimization makes it vulnerable during economic downturns when companies typically cut discretionary software spending and reduce engineering headcount. The platform's value proposition around resource efficiency may be less compelling when organizations are already operating with constrained budgets and smaller teams.