Activation Over MQLs in PLG

Diving deeper into

Blake Bartlett, partner at OpenView, on the future of product-led growth

Interview
These are more relevant top-of-funnel metrics for PLG than traditional B2B marketing metrics like MQLs.
Analyzed 3 sources

The main strategic shift in PLG is that the top of the funnel moves from people filling out forms to people getting value inside the product. A self serve company wins by getting a new user to sign up, reach a first useful action, come back within days, and pay by card without talking to sales. That is why signup volume, activation, short term retention, and self serve conversion matter more than MQLs, which mainly measure whether marketing produced names for a sales team.

  • PLG turns B2B software into a consumer style funnel. The key question is not whether a prospect downloaded a white paper, but whether they hit an aha moment in the first or second session. That makes 7 day and 14 day retention early proof that the product is actually pulling users forward.
  • This changes the data stack and the teams using it. PLG companies need product telemetry that shows what users clicked, built, shared, or invited, because sales assist and growth experiments depend on actual in product behavior. Traditional marketing systems built around lead capture do not show that journey well.
  • The same pattern shows up in practice at self serve companies. DocSend tracked product usage units like links created and found support often converted users better than sales, because small customers were deciding inside the product. Customer.io similarly framed PLG around the user lifecycle, not the classic lead funnel.

Going forward, the best PLG companies will treat the first few sessions as the real top of funnel and build teams around improving activation, retention, and product qualified expansion. Marketing will increasingly be judged by how many users reach value, not how many names enter a CRM.