Switching Costs Driven by Inertia
Roam
The real moat here is habit, not budget. Once a company already runs its meetings in Zoom, chats in Slack, and internal calls in Teams, replacing those tools means changing where people click, where notes live, how managers share updates, and what security and IT teams support. That slows down buying even when a new product is cheaper or bundles more features, because the hardest part is rewiring daily behavior across the whole company.
-
Zoom, Slack, and Teams are not just apps, they are already wired into existing contracts and workflows. Zoom did $4.87B in fiscal 2026 revenue, Slack now includes meeting summaries and huddle notes in paid plans, and Microsoft maintained standalone Teams pricing tied to its suite pricing changes effective November 1, 2025.
-
That means Roam is usually not competing against a blank budget line. It is competing against tools that feel pre approved because procurement, identity management, compliance review, and employee training were already done months or years earlier, which is the same enterprise agreement dynamic seen across other software categories.
-
Roam's opening is that incumbents mostly add point features, while it tries to turn every meeting into a persistent workspace with summaries, async video, and follow on workflow capture in one place. The bet is that a company will switch only if that tighter loop changes how teams actually run work, not just how they record calls.
The category is heading toward a split between bundled meeting features and workflow systems built on top of meetings. Incumbents will keep making note taking and summaries good enough inside existing suites, while Roam has to prove that owning the layer after the meeting creates enough operational pull to overcome the friction of changing company wide behavior.