Auction Houses Monetize NFTs, Museums Legitimize
Duncan Cock Foster, co-founder of Nifty Gateway, on NFTs as luxury goods
The key point is that Sotheby's and Christie's adopt new categories when they see buyer demand, not when they decide a medium belongs in art history. In practice, that means they can move from paintings to sneakers to NFTs using the same fee driven model, where the job is to source objects, attract bidders, and take a cut of each sale. Museums play a different role, because acquisition is part of building a long term canon, not maximizing near term transaction volume.
-
Sotheby's actively runs sneakers and modern collectibles auctions, which makes the point concrete. It is already set up to monetize any collectible category with enough demand, whether that is fine art, sports memorabilia, or limited edition shoes.
-
Christie's treated NFTs the same way it treats any emerging sale category. It brought Beeple's Everydays to auction in February 2021, then built a broader Digital Art and NFTs program around auctions, crypto payments, and specialist led curation once collector demand was proven.
-
LACMA and MoMA have moved more slowly, but their actions look different. LACMA launched a digital art acquisition fund in 2022 and added a major blockchain art collection in 2023, while MoMA announced a landmark digital art acquisition program in 2023, showing institution building rather than sales expansion.
Going forward, auction houses will keep being the fast monetizers for new collectible formats, while museums will remain the slower legitimacy layer that decides what endures. If NFTs continue maturing as digital luxury and digital art, the winners will be the platforms and artists that can satisfy both tracks, near term buyer appetite and long term cultural validation.