Compliance Evidence Powers Multiple Certifications
Diving deeper into
How Vanta, Secureframe and Laika are arming the rebels of B2B SaaS
A key expansion opportunity for Secureframe/Vanta/Laika is repurposing the data they collect to help startups collect other certifications.
Analyzed 5 sources
Reviewing context
The real product is not a SOC 2 checklist, it is a reusable system of record for how a startup runs security. Once Vanta, Secureframe, or Laika are connected to HR, cloud, device, identity, and ticketing systems, they already hold much of the evidence needed for adjacent frameworks. That turns each new certification into mostly a mapping problem, not a fresh implementation.
-
Many controls repeat across frameworks. Secureframe describes SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI DSS as overlapping lists of required practices, like background checks, encryption, and audit logs. It also found SOC 2 and ISO 27001 share more than 90% of controls, which makes cross sell into a second framework unusually efficient.
-
The data collection layer is the moat. These platforms connect to systems like AWS, Google Cloud, Checkr, Vetty, Jamf, and DocuSign, then continuously pull proof that employees were screened, devices are managed, and logs are enabled. Auditors review that evidence, so the same live feed can support annual renewals and additional frameworks.
-
This is why pricing often scales per framework, not just per seat. Secureframe says it charges annually by company size and by framework, and current product pages show support extending well beyond SOC 2 into ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, CCPA, NIST, and more. More frameworks means higher ACV without needing a new buyer.
The next step is moving from compliance prep into always on security operations. As frameworks pile up, the winning platform will be the one that turns evidence collection into a broader control plane for monitoring gaps, pushing fixes, and selling a startup from its first audit all the way to enterprise grade governance.