Webinars as Demand Gen Systems
Diving deeper into
Forrest Leighton, SVP of marketing at Chatmeter, on the webinar stack
Webinars, at the past four or five companies I've worked at, have been a great sales tool to drive real engagement.
Analyzed 4 sources
Reviewing context
Webinars work as a sales asset because they turn a cold prospect into a warm hand raise with context attached. The real value is not the live event alone. It is the data trail after it, who registered, who showed up, who asked questions, which poll option they picked, and who watched the recording later. That gives sales a much easier first outreach than a generic demo request or ebook download.
-
At CB Insights, the winning format was education plus product. An analyst could teach a market topic, then the team could show how the platform answered that exact problem. That made the product feel like a practical tool, not a software pitch, and helped move research readers into product evaluation.
-
The bottleneck is not video quality, it is usable follow up data. Leighton describes poll answers, chat, questions, and attendance depth as the inputs that make sales outreach relevant. When that data is lost or hard to export, the webinar loses much of its pipeline value.
-
Across other teams, the same pattern shows up. EditShare uses webinars to surface product interest, then gets far more viewing after the event than during it, around 10 to 1. Wistia built webinar software around this exact behavior, combining registration, hosting, lead capture, repurposing, and analytics in one workflow.
The market is heading toward webinar systems that behave less like event tools and more like demand gen systems. The winners will be the products that capture intent cleanly, push it into HubSpot or Salesforce without manual work, and turn one session into a long tail of gated video, snippets, and sales signals.