Snyk Cloud Infrastructure Gap

This is the core gap between a developer security suite and a cloud security specialist. Snyk started from the code repository and CI pipeline, where developers fix vulnerable packages, bad code patterns, and misconfigured IaC before release. Specialized CSPM vendors started from the live cloud account, where they map AWS, Azure, and GCP resources, trace identity paths, spot exposed data stores, and rank which runtime risks can actually be exploited across thousands of assets.

• In practice, Snyk fits naturally into GitHub and GitLab workflows. A developer sees findings in pull requests and IDEs, fixes them before merge, and keeps shipping. A CSPM buyer usually wants a security team console that continuously inventories running cloud assets and shows blast radius across identities, networks, workloads, and data.
  1 sacra 4 sacra
• That difference shows up in competition. Wiz built its business on cloud security first, then moved into application security from an installed CISO budget base. Snyk moved the opposite direction, adding Snyk Cloud after building a developer led AppSec business, which makes cloud depth harder to earn than cloud adjacency.
  1 sacra 2 sacra 3 sacra
• The market has since converged into bundles. GitHub embeds scanning where developers already work, while Wiz, Palo Alto Networks, and CrowdStrike bundle AppSec into broader cloud security suites. That leaves Snyk needing to prove it can do both developer workflow and real cloud risk prioritization well enough to win platform deals.
  2 sacra 3 sacra

Going forward, the winners in this category will be the vendors that connect code level issues to live cloud exposure in one workflow. Snyk already has the developer entry point. To close the gap with CSPM specialists, it has to turn cloud security from an adjacent product into a system of record for how infrastructure is actually running in production.