DryRun as AppSec Prioritization Platform

This move is really about budget expansion, because the system that decides what gets fixed usually matters more to security leaders than the scanner that found the issue. A PR scanner helps developers catch problems in one workflow. A prioritization system sits above many repos and many tools, shows which risks are actually worth engineering time, and gives leaders a place to track status, trends, and ownership over time.

• DryRun is already building the pieces needed for that control layer. Risk Register aggregates findings from its PR agent and DeepScan, normalizes severity, and lets teams filter by status, source, and date. Codebase Intelligence adds natural language querying across repos, which turns stored security data into an operating console, not just a list of alerts.
  1 sacra 2 dryrun
• This is the same expansion path taken by ASPM vendors like Apiiro and OX Security. Their products are built around ingesting findings from many tools, adding code and runtime context, and helping AppSec teams rank what is actually exploitable or business critical. That market logic supports larger platform deals than a standalone scanner usually can.
  3 apiiro 4 ox 5 apiiro 6 ox
• The commercial effect is stakeholder expansion. PR review is mostly a developer and AppSec engineer workflow. A risk register and query layer also pull in security leaders, engineering managers, compliance owners, and platform teams, which usually means more seats, stronger renewal leverage, and less risk of being replaced by a native GitHub feature.
  1 sacra 2 dryrun 7 github

The next step is a full AppSec operating layer that sits between code scanners below and security leadership above. If DryRun keeps owning prioritization, workflow, and historical risk memory, it can grow from a useful review tool into the place where an organization runs day to day application security decisions.