Big Chains Internalizing Delivery Robots
Coco Robotics
The real risk is that robot delivery can shift from a differentiated service into a procurement decision for the biggest restaurant brands. Domino's spent years exploring its own robot concepts before moving to Nuro for live delivery in Houston, which shows how large chains can treat autonomy as a build or buy decision. For Coco, that means long term advantage has to come from running a denser, cheaper, more reliable fleet, not just from having a robot that works.
-
Domino's internal work was not theoretical. It unveiled the DRU robot in 2016 through its Australia and New Zealand operation, then partnered with Nuro in 2019 and launched autonomous pizza delivery in Houston in 2021. That progression shows a large buyer testing the stack itself, then outsourcing when a specialist was faster to deploy.
-
Coco is built around the opposite model. Some merchants use it through Uber and DoorDash, but others want branded in house fleets, and Coco already sells into that workflow. That makes the company partly a fleet operator and partly a robot supplier, which is useful if major chains want more control over branding, routing, and store operations.
-
The dividing line is operational complexity. Coco argues the hard part is not only autonomous navigation, but hitting near perfect completion rates on hot food orders, keeping teleoperators efficient, and maintaining vehicles cheaply across thousands of merchants. If those operating systems stay hard, customers partner. If they get standardized, big chains have more reason to internalize.
The market is heading toward a split structure. National chains with enough order density will push for branded, semi proprietary fleets, while smaller merchants and aggregators will keep buying robot delivery as a service. The winners will be the companies that become easiest to plug into either model, with the lowest cost per delivery and the best reliability at city scale.