Carrier Billing Is The Battleground
SpaceX
This market will be won less by who puts radios in space first, and more by who turns satellite coverage into a line item on the monthly phone bill. In practice, that means the carrier usually keeps the customer, sets the bundle, and uses the satellite network like a wholesale input. AST fits that model with AT&T and Vodafone. SpaceX is starting there with T-Mobile, but its larger move is to own enough spectrum and network capacity to eventually sell mobile service more directly, not just power someone else’s plan.
-
Carrier billing control matters because the carrier owns the app, the plan, the retail store, the support call, and the upgrade cycle. If satellite service shows up as a premium add on inside an AT&T or T-Mobile plan, the satellite operator gets paid in wholesale fees while the carrier keeps the recurring customer relationship.
-
SpaceX is structurally better positioned to break out of the wholesale role. Starlink already has millions of broadband users, its own hardware distribution, nearly 9,500 active satellites as of January 2026, and a $17B EchoStar spectrum deal aimed at expanding from messaging into voice and video. That gives it a path from carrier partner to carrier substitute.
-
The rest of the field is mostly partnership based. Apple uses Globalstar to make satellite features part of the iPhone experience, not a standalone telecom product. Verizon and AT&T have backed AST and Kuiper as counterweights. That points to a fragmented market where most satellite players sell capacity to carriers, while SpaceX tries to collapse the stack.
The next phase is a split market. Most direct to phone providers will become invisible wholesale pipes behind carrier plans, while SpaceX pushes toward a global by default mobile product that bundles coverage, spectrum, and billing under one roof. If that happens, the center of gravity moves from satellite access to customer ownership and recurring ARPU.