Runwise outcome-based building controls

The key difference is that Runwise gets paid to keep buildings saving money, while legacy controls vendors mostly get paid when the box is sold and installed. That changes what each company optimizes for. Runwise prices around ongoing savings, installs wireless controls in a day or less, and keeps improving performance through software. Traditional systems have often meant expensive wired installs, contractor handoffs, and controls that can sit largely unchanged for years after purchase.

• Runwise sells a monthly or annual operating outcome, not just a controller. In one example, the pitch is roughly $10,000 upfront and $10,000 per year against about $80,000 in annual savings, with a guarantee. That makes retention depend on lower bills and fewer headaches, not on shipping more hardware.
  2 sacra 3 runwise
• The old model is usually heavier and more fragmented. Runwise describes legacy systems as requiring miles of wiring, electricians, and separate vendors for different functions. Its own customer case study shows why owners care, one network, one install, one app, and one support contract instead of multiple crews and monitoring fees.
  2 sacra 4 runwise
• Incumbents still matter because they have huge installed bases and broad service channels. Johnson Controls says it operates through branches and distribution channels, and Honeywell highlights accredited system integrator partner networks. But that channel structure also means the software experience and ongoing optimization are not always the core economic driver.
  5 johnsoncontrols 6 honeywell 7 honeywell

This market is heading toward more software priced against measurable operating results. As controls spread from heating into cooling, gas, leaks, and water, the winning vendors are likely to be the ones that become the building system of record, stay in the loop every day, and turn a one time capital purchase into a recurring operating relationship.