FTC All-In Pricing Reduced StubHub Demand

This reveals how much of secondary ticketing demand was being created by the way prices were shown, not just by underlying event demand. StubHub makes about 20% of GMS from buyer and seller fees, and the new FTC rule forces the first price a shopper sees to include those mandatory charges, which makes tickets look more expensive upfront and lowers checkout conversion. That effect hit right as blockbuster tour comps also got harder, helping push 1H25 revenue growth down to 3%.

• The rule is specific. Since May 12, 2025, ticket sellers must show the total price including mandatory service and fulfillment fees, with only taxes, shipping, and optional add ons excluded. The FTC then sent StubHub a warning letter saying some listings still appeared to leave out required charges, with penalties of up to $53,088 per violation.
  2 ftc 4 ftc
• StubHub is especially exposed because its core product historically monetized both sides of the transaction. In 2024 it processed $8.68 billion of GMS and generated $1.77 billion of revenue, about a 20% take rate. When all in pricing makes a $200 ticket look like $240 at the first click instead of the last screen, fewer shoppers continue.
  1 sacra
• This is not just a compliance issue, it reshapes competition. The FTC rule does not ban fees, it changes who looks expensive in the first impression. That narrows the advantage of drip pricing and rewards products that win on inventory, trust, and seat selection, while making pure marketplace conversion more sensitive to visible fee loads.
  2 ftc 3 sec 5 ftc

The next phase is a secondary market where conversion depends less on hiding fees and more on controlling supply and owning the full ticketing workflow. That is why StubHub is pushing into direct issuance and primary partnerships. If more inventory starts on StubHub instead of arriving from outside sellers, the company can protect margins even in a fully transparent pricing world.