Underdog's Fantasy-First Model

Diving deeper into

Trevor John, co-founder of Underdog Fantasy, on the business model of fantasy sports

Interview
the company can still exist and be successful even if conversion rates are low.
Analyzed 5 sources

Low conversion does not break the model, because fantasy itself is already a real cash business, not just a funnel. Underdog makes money when users enter season long drafts and pick'em contests, with pick'em driving more frequent transactions and best ball keeping people active for months. That gives the company time to build habit and brand loyalty before trying to move users into sportsbook products.

  • The core economics work even before sportsbook conversion. Underdog takes contest fees on fantasy games, typically around a 10% to 15% rake, and Trevor John describes daily fantasy as a business that still generates revenue on its own.
  • The reason companies still push conversion is that each step up the ladder is worth more. Fantasy can acquire users at roughly one tenth the cost of sportsbook acquisition, while sportsbook and especially iGaming produce much higher margins and lifetime value.
  • This is why niche and fantasy first players can survive. Sleeper is still centered on season long engagement, PrizePicks built a large pick'em business without venture funding, and Underdog itself was built around season long drafts before adding a sportsbook in North Carolina with a shared wallet and login.

Going forward, the winners are likely to be the companies that can keep fantasy profitable as a standalone habit while layering in higher value products only where the user is ready. That makes fantasy less of a temporary promo channel and more of the durable customer base that future sportsbook and iGaming expansion is built on.