Huntress Becoming Core Security Line
Huntress
This signals that Huntress is trying to move from an MSP add on into a core security line item. In these mid market accounts, the buyer is no longer choosing a lightweight tool for an outsourced IT partner to run. They are comparing Huntress against a full MDR contract from Arctic Wolf, or against a broader endpoint stack from CrowdStrike that can expand into managed response, identity, and log security.1 2 3 4 5
- Arctic Wolf built its business around companies that do not want to staff their own SOC. It sells a white glove MDR service that takes in logs, deploys an agent, and gives a mid sized business outsourced analysts for far less than hiring an internal team. That makes it a natural budget alternative when an internal IT team decides to buy outcomes instead of tools.2 3
- CrowdStrike competes from the other direction. A buyer can start with Falcon endpoint software, then add Falcon Complete MDR and adjacent modules on the same platform. That means the security budget can collapse into one vendor that already covers endpoint, identity, cloud, and managed response, which is a harder comparison than Huntress faces in the MSP channel.4 5
- Huntress can reach these customers through resellers, Azure Marketplace, or direct purchase, but its own buying flow makes the tradeoff clear. Through an MSP, the partner handles rollout and daily operations. Direct or reseller buyers still get Huntress SOC coverage, but they must own deployment, monitoring, incident follow through, and integrations themselves.1 4
The next step is a heavier product and go to market model. As Huntress sells further into internally managed mid market environments, it will need to look less like a channel friendly managed add on and more like a full security platform that can survive head to head evaluations against outsourced MDR suites and bundled enterprise endpoint platforms.1 4 5