Slides as Multimodal Battleground
Gamma vs Anthropic
Slides are turning into just another output format for frontier models, which raises the bar for standalone slide tools from making decks faster to owning a better work product. Anthropic is no longer only answering questions in chat, it can now create and edit .pptx files and also works inside PowerPoint, while Gamma has spent years building a format that starts from business communication itself, with responsive cards, web style layouts, and exports for when users still need standard decks.
-
For Anthropic, slides sit beside spreadsheets, docs, and PDFs as core business file types. That is what multimodal means in practice, not just text and images, but the ability to turn raw inputs into the actual files people send to bosses, customers, and teammates.
-
Gamma was built around the idea that classic slides are a bad container for modern work. Its card based format reflows on mobile, mixes text, images, embeds, and interactivity, and can become a presentation, a document, or a lightweight web page from the same source content.
-
That creates an uneven fight. Anthropic can bundle slide generation into a much broader AI workflow and price it inside high value subscriptions, while Gamma competes on sharper creation UX and a native format that feels less like filling rectangles and more like publishing a polished page.
The market is heading toward a split where model labs own the generic generation layer and product companies win by owning the workflow and the format. That favors Gamma if it keeps expanding from decks into docs, microsites, and social assets faster than foundation models can turn slide generation into a commodity feature.