Unified Verification Engine for SMBs and Enterprises

Veriff is using one verification engine with adjustable levels of automation and human review, which means it can sell the same core workflow to a startup that wants cheap instant checks and to a regulated enterprise that needs tighter controls. The product stays the same at the base layer, document capture, biometrics, risk checks, and decisioning, while pricing, review depth, branding, and support expand as customer risk and volume rise.

• The self serve ladder shows how this works in practice. Essential uses Full Auto at $0.80 per verification for low risk use cases, while Plus and Premium use Hybrid review at $1.39 and $1.89, then enterprise plans add volume pricing, configurable flows, white labeled experiences, and dedicated support for accounts above 1,000 verifications per month.
  1 veriff
• That is cheaper to build and maintain than running separate SMB and enterprise products. The same hosted flow, SDKs, and API can serve both ends of the market, with manual specialists stepping in only when accuracy or fraud risk requires it. Veriff can keep software like economics on routine sessions and spend labor only on the harder ones.
  2 veriff 3 veriff
• This is also how Veriff lines up against larger rivals. Jumio and Entrust, after buying Onfido, compete for high assurance enterprise onboarding, but Veriff can start smaller customers on self serve usage pricing and move them up the same stack as they add compliance needs, instead of forcing a reimplementation onto a different product.
  4 sacra 5 jumio

The next step is deeper packaging around that shared architecture. As more fraud tools, monitoring, and workflow controls are added onto the same verification session, Veriff can widen the gap between basic low cost checks and high assurance enterprise programs while keeping one product spine underneath, which should improve expansion revenue and make migrations away from the platform harder.