DryRun becomes code risk prioritization system

DryRun is moving up the stack from spotting flaws in one pull request to deciding which security work matters across many repos and teams. The important change is not another scanner, it is a shared control layer where AppSec leaders can see PR findings and full repo assessments in one place, sort them by exploitability and status, and turn scattered alerts into an org level fix list that engineering managers can actually act on.

• This changes the buyer and the budget. PR review is mainly a developer workflow inside GitHub or GitLab. Risk Register adds a leadership workflow for AppSec managers, compliance owners, and engineering leaders, which supports broader seat expansion and larger renewals.
  1 sacra
• The product logic is similar to what Apiiro and Ox Security are trying to do in AppSec posture management. The winning layer is often not the tool that finds the most issues, but the one that explains which few issues deserve scarce engineering time.
  1 sacra
• It also makes DeepScan more valuable. A full repo scan can create a long list of findings, but once those results are normalized beside PR findings, security teams can compare newly introduced risk against older backlog risk instead of managing each stream in a separate spreadsheet or ticket queue.
  1 sacra

From here, the natural path is for DryRun to become a system of record for code risk, not just a comment bot in code review. If it keeps owning the layer where teams triage, assign, and track security work across repositories, it can expand from developer tooling into a broader AppSec platform purchase.