Filevine versus Harvey and Legora pricing
$250M/year Notion of personal injury litigation
The pricing gap shows that Filevine is selling labor leverage to the whole litigation team, while Harvey and Legora are selling premium AI time mainly to lawyers. Filevine started as the daily system of record for plaintiff firms, where paralegals and case managers live inside matters, upload records, track deadlines, send signatures, and move cases forward. That makes an $87 per user product easier to spread across an entire small firm than a $250 to $1K seat reserved for a handful of attorneys.
-
Filevine wins from breadth. A personal injury firm might put most of its staff into Filevine because everyone touches case data, billing, documents, and tasks. Harvey and Legora are more often justified one lawyer at a time, for research, drafting, and matter analysis, which naturally supports much higher seat prices.
-
The comparison is also back office versus front office. Filevine added payments and billing in 2023, then moved into lawyer facing AI like case Q&A, demand drafting, and deposition prep. Harvey and Legora came from the opposite direction, starting with lawyer workflows and then pushing toward broader legal work.
-
This split explains the valuation gap. Filevine reached an estimated $250M ARR by April 2026 on a much lower price point because it can land many more seats per firm. Harvey at $300M ARR in May 2026 and Legora at $100M ARR in April 2026 are valued on faster AI growth and premium pricing, not wider staff penetration.
The next phase is convergence. Filevine is moving up from case management into attorney AI, while Harvey and Legora are moving down from lawyer copilots into workflow. The company that best combines system of record depth with high value legal automation will capture more seats, more spend per firm, and more control over litigation work.