Build Hooks Enabled Editor-Friendly Jamstack
Cole Krumbholz, founder at Formspree, on the future of full-stack development
Build hooks turned Jamstack from a developer only publishing method into an editor friendly content workflow. The key change was that a CMS could send one POST request and trigger a fresh build and deploy, instead of asking a writer to touch Git or asking a developer to manually recompile the site. That made static sites usable for the same everyday publishing jobs that kept WordPress sticky with marketing teams and editorial teams.
-
In a WordPress setup, content is saved in a database and appears on the next page request. In early Jamstack, content often lived in markdown files inside a repo, so publishing required commits and build steps. Build hooks removed that handoff by letting hosting infrastructure rebuild automatically when content changed.
-
Headless CMS products like Contentful fit neatly into this model. Editors work in a normal CMS screen, then the CMS fires a webhook to the host, which starts a new build and deploy. Contentful describes this as fully automated rebuilding for static sites, and Netlify documents build hooks as URLs that trigger new builds and deploys.
-
This also helps explain Netlify versus Vercel. Netlify grew around content heavy website workflows and cross framework deployment, while Vercel grew around JavaScript and full stack app developer experience. Build hooks mattered most where teams were replacing WordPress style publishing, not just shipping app code.
The next step is making rebuild based publishing feel as immediate as database driven publishing. That is why the market keeps moving toward preview links, incremental builds, and edge rendering. The winners will preserve the editor simplicity that build hooks introduced, while shrinking the wait between clicking publish and seeing the page live.