Zero-Commission Namma Yatri Threatens Rapido
Rapido
The real threat is not just lower pricing, it is that ONDC can turn ride hailing into shared plumbing while Namma Yatri uses that plumbing to strip out the marketplace tax. Rapido still depends on monetizing each ride, even as it shifts some drivers to daily subscription fees, while Namma Yatri routes more of the fare directly to drivers and can surface supply across multiple buyer apps instead of owning the rider relationship end to end.
-
Namma Yatri was built with Bengaluru's auto driver union, expanded to Delhi and Hyderabad, and ONDC has highlighted it as an open source, zero commission mobility app that uses a subscription fee instead of per ride commissions. That message lands well with drivers because the money flow is simple, the fare goes to the driver, and the app charges access rather than a cut of each trip.
-
ONDC's structure weakens the normal ride hailing moat. Buyer apps and seller apps are separated, so one pool of drivers can be discovered through many consumer apps. ONDC and outside reporting both describe this interoperability directly, and redBus has already launched mobility booking on the network with Juspay handling the ONDC integration.
-
Rapido is already reacting. Its model has moved from a 15% to 20% commission on rides toward daily driver fees of ₹5 to ₹29, and management has publicly said the company moved away from commissions. That makes the competitive line less about who can charge riders more, and more about who can aggregate the most supply at the lowest driver acquisition cost.
Going forward, the likely outcome is a split market. Closed apps like Rapido will keep winning where density, safety operations, and bundled services matter, while ONDC linked apps push ride booking toward a lower take rate utility layer. If ONDC mobility keeps expanding across buyer apps and cities, Rapido's margin pool will increasingly come from subscriptions, cross sell, and higher frequency services rather than pure commissions.